Written on
January 16, 2012 – 4:00 am | by pookie
During the Great Depression, women made up 25% of the work force, but their jobs were more unstable, temporary or seasonal then men, and the unemployment rate was much greater. There was also a decided bias and cultural view that “women didn’t work” and in fact many who were employed full time often called themselves “homemakers.” Neither men in the workforce, the unions, nor any branch of government were ready to accept the reality of working women, and this bias caused females intense hardship while the Great Depression.
![]()
The 1930’s was particularly hard on single, divorced or widowed women, but it was harder still on women who weren’t White. Women of color had to overcome both sexual and racial stereotyping. Black women in the North suffered an overwhelming 42.9% unemployment, while 23.2%. Of White women were without work agreeing to the 1937 census. In the South, both Black and White women were equally unemployed at 26%. In contrast, the unemployment rate for Black and White men in the North (38.9%/18.1%) and South (18%/16% respectively) were also lower than female counterparts.
Home Network
The financial situation in Harlem was bleak even before the Great Depression. But afterward, the emerging Black working class in the North was decimated by wholesale layoffs of Black industrial workers. To be Black and a woman alone, made holding a job or seeing an additional one one nearly impossible. The racial work hierarchy substituted Black women in waitressing or domestic work, with White women, now desperate for work, and willing to take steep wage cuts.
The imperceptible Women of the Great Depression
Buffalo Technology LinkStation Pro Duo 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) RAID Network Attached Storage LS-WV4.0TL/R1 (Black) Review
Buffalo Technology LinkStation Pro Duo 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) RAID Network Attached Storage LS-WV4.0TL/R1 (Black) Feature
- High performance 1.6 GHz processor
- WebAccess App for your iPhone, iPod or iPad
- NovaBACKUP for Windows PCs
- Time Machine support for Macs
- High speed 70MB/s file transfer rate
Buffalo Technology LinkStation Pro Duo 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) RAID Network Attached Storage LS-WV4.0TL/R1 (Black) Overview
LinkStation Pro Duo LS-WVL/R1 RAID NAS hard drive array offers instant storage expansion and file access on your home or home office network and over the Internet. Twice as fast as a standard NAS, LS-WVL/R1 features a high-speed, 1.6 GHz processor for maximum transfer speeds up to 72 MBps. Plug it into any network Ethernet port or into the back of your wireless router and access it on any networked computer in your house. While on the go, use Buffalo’s free WebAccess service for remote access to your files over the Internet from any standard Web browser or download the free WebAccess i apps from the App Store to access and share files from your iPhone, iPod touch and iPad. Included NovaBACKUP Professional software for Windows and Time Machine support provide a whole home backup solution for every PC and Mac on your network. LinkStation Pro Duo makes central storage and backup easy.
*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Jan 15, 2012 22:00:23
Survival Entrepreneurs
At the start of the Depression, while one study found that homeless women were most likely factory and assistance workers, domestics, garment workers, waitresses and beauticians; an additional one recommend that the charm commerce was a major source of wage for Black women. These women, later known as “survivalist entrepreneurs,” became self-employed in response to a desperate need to find an independent means of livelihood.”
Replaced by White women in more primary domestic work as cooks, maids, nurses, and laundresses, even skilled and educated Black women were so hopeless, ”that they really offered their services at the so-called ’slave markets’-street corners where Negro women congregated to await White housewives who came daily to take their pick and bid wages down” (Boyd, 2000 citing Drake and Cayton, 1945/1962:246). Moreover, the home domestic assistance was very difficult, if not impossible, to coordinate with family responsibilities, as the domestic servant was usually on call ”around the clock” and was branch to the ”arbitrary power of private employers.”
Inn Keepers and Hairdressers
Two occupations were sought out by Black women, in order to address both the need for wage (or barter items) and their domestic responsibilities in northern cities while the Great Depression: (1) boarding house and lodging house keeping; and (2) hairdressing and charm culture.
During the “Great Migration” of 1915-1930, thousands of Blacks from the South, mostly young, singular men, streamed into Northern cities, seeing for places to stay temporarily while they searched for housing and jobs. Housing these migrants created opportunities for Black working-class women,-now unemployed-to pay their rent.
According to one estimate, ”at least one-third” of Black families in the urban North had lodgers or boarders while the Great Migration (Thomas, 1992:93, citing Henri, 1976). The need was so great, complicated boarders were housed, leading one recognize of northern Black families to record that ‘’seventy-five percent of the Negro homes have so many lodgers that they are really hotels.”
Women were usually at the center of these webs of family and society networks within the Black community:
“They ”undertook the many part of the burden” of helping the newcomers find interim housing. Women played ”connective and leadership roles” in northern Black communities, not only because it was carefully primary “woman’s work,” but also because taking in boarders and lodgers helped Black women couple housework with an informal, income-producing operation (Grossman, 1989:133). In addition, boarding and lodging house holding was often combined with other types of self-employment. Some of the Black women who kept boarders and lodgers also earned money by manufacture artificial flowers and lamp shades at home.” (Boyd, 2000)
In increasing from 1890 to 1940, ”barbers and hairdressers” were the largest segments of the Black business population, together comprising about one third of this citizen in 1940 (Boyd, 2000 citing Oak, 1949:48).
“Blacks tended to gravitate into these occupations because “White barbers, hairdressers, and beauticians were unwilling or unable to style the hair of Blacks or to supply the hair preparations and cosmetics used by them. Thus, Black barbers, hairdressers, and beauticians had a ”protected consumer market” based on Whites’ desires for collective length from Blacks and on the special demands of Black consumers. Accordingly, these Black entrepreneurs were sheltered from surface competitors and could monopolize the trades of charm culture and hairdressing within their own communities.
Black women who were seeking jobs believed that one’s appearance was a crucial factor in seeing employment. Black self-help organizations in northern cities, such as the Urban League and the National Council of Negro Women, stressed the point of good grooming to the newly arrived Black women from the South, advising them to have neat hair and clean nails when searching for work. Above all, the women were told avoid wearing ”head rags” and ”dust caps” in collective (Boyd, 2000 citing Drake and Cayton, 1945/1962:247, 301; Grossman, 1989:150-151).
These warnings were particularly relevant to those who were seeing for secretarial or white-collar jobs, for Black women needed straight hair and light skin to have any chance of obtaining such positions. Despite the hard times, charm parlors and barber shops were the most numerous and viable Black-owned enterprises in Black communities (e.g., Boyd, 2000 citing Drake and Cayton, 1945/1962:450-451).
Black women entrepreneurs in the urban North also opened shop and restaurants, with modest savings ”as a means of securing a living” (Boyd, 2000 citing Frazier, 1949:405). Called ”depression businesses,” these marginal enterprises were often classified as proprietorships, even though they tended to operate out of ”houses, basements, and old buildings” (Boyd, 2000 citing Drake and Cayton, 1945/1962:454).
“Food shop and eating and drinking places were the most common of these businesses, because, if they failed, their owners could still live off their stocks.”
“Protestant Whites Only”
These businesses were a necessity for Black women, as the preference for hiring Whites climbed steeply while the Depression. In the Philadelphia collective Employment Office in 1932 & 1933, 68% of job orders for women specified “Whites Only.” In New York City, Black women were forced to go to detach unemployment offices in Harlem to seek work. Black churches and church-related institutions, a primary source of help to the Black community, were overwhelmed by the demand, while the 1930’s. Municipal shelters, required to “accept everyone,” still reported that Catholics and African American women were “particularly hard to place.”
No one knows the numbers of Black women left homeless in the early thirty’s, but it was no doubt substantial, and imperceptible to the mostly white investigators. Instead, the media chose to focus on, and publicize the plight of White, homeless, middle-class “white collar” workers, as, by 1931 and 1932, unemployment spread to this middle-class. White-collar and college-educated women, usually accustomed “to quarterly employment and garage domicile,” became the “New Poor.” We don’t know the homeless rates for these women, beyond an educated guess, but of all the homeless in urban centers, 10% were recommend to be women. We do know, however, that the query for “female beds” in shelters climbed from a bit over 3,000 in 1920 to 56,808 by 1932 in one city and in another, from 1929 -1930, query rose 270%.
“Having an Address is a Luxury Now…”
Even these beds, however, were the last stop on the path towards homelessness and were designed for “habitually destitute” women, and avoided at all cost by those who were homeless for the first time. Some whole ended up in shelters, but even more were not registered with any agency. Resources were few. crisis home relief was restricted to families with dependent children until 1934. “Having an address is a luxury just now” an unemployed college woman told a collective employee in 1932.
These newly destitute urban women were the shocked and dazed who drifted from one unemployment office to the next, resting in Grand Central or Pennsylvania station, and who rode the subway all night (the “five cent room”), or slept in the park, and who ate in penny kitchens. Slow to seek assistance, and fearful and ashamed to ask for charity, these women were often on the verge of starvation before they sought help. They were, agreeing to one report, often the “saddest and most difficult to help.” These women “starved gently in furnished rooms. They sold their furniture, their clothes, and then their bodies.”
The Emancipated Woman and Gender Myths
If cultural myths were that women “didn’t work,” then those that did were invisible. Their political voice was mute. Gender role demanded that women remain “someone’s poor relation,” who returned back to the rural homestead while times of trouble, to help out colse to the home, and were given shelter. These idyllic nurturing, pre-industrial mythical family homes were large sufficient to accommodate everyone. The new reality was much bleaker. Urban apartments, no bigger than two or three rooms, required “maiden aunts” or “single cousins” to “shift for themselves.” What remained of the family was often a strained, overburdened, over-crowded household that often contained severe domestic troubles of its own.
In addition, few, other than African Americans, were with the rural roots to return to. And this assumed that a woman once emancipated and tasting past success would remain “malleable.” The female role was an out-of-date myth, but was nonetheless a potent one. The “new woman” of the roaring twenties was now left without a collective face while the Great Depression. Without a home–the quintessential element of womanhood–she was, paradoxically, ignored and invisible.
“…Neighborliness has been Stretched Beyond Human Endurance.”
In reality, more than half of these employed women had never married, while others were divorced, deserted, separated or claimed to be widowed. We don’t know how many were lesbian women. Some had dependent parents and siblings who relied on them for support. Fewer had children who were living with extended family. Women’s wages were historically low for most female professions, and allowed little capacity for great “emergency” savings, but most of these women were financially independent. In Milwaukee, for example, 60% of those seeking help had been self-supporting in 1929. In New York, this figure was 85%. Their ready work was often the most evaporative and at risk. Some had been unemployed for months, while others for a year or more. With savings and assurance gone, they had tapped out their informal collective networks. One collective worker, in late 1931, testified to a Senate committee that “neighborliness has been stretched not only beyond its capacity but beyond human endurance.”
Older women were often discriminated against because of their age, and their long history of living surface of primary family systems. When work was available, it often specified, as did one job in Philadelphia, a query for “white stenographers and clerks, under (age) 25.”
The imperceptible Woman
The Great Depression’s consequent on women, then, as it is now, was imperceptible to the eye. The tangible evidence of breadlines, Hoovervilles, and men selling apples on road corners, did not comprise images of urban women. Unemployment, hunger and homelessness was carefully a “man’s problem” and the distress and despair was measured in that way. In photographic images, and news reports, destitute urban women were overlooked or not apparent. It was carefully unseemly to be a homeless woman, and they were often incommunicable from collective view, ushered in straight through back door entrances, and fed in private.
Partly, the question lay in expectations. While homelessness in men had swelled periodically while periods of economic crisis, since the depression of the 1890’s onward, large numbers of homeless women “on their own” were a new phenomenon. collective officials were unprepared: Without children, they were, early on, excluded from crisis shelters. One construction with a capacity of 155 beds and six cribs, lodged over 56,000 “beds” while the third year of the depression. Still, these figures do not take inventory the whole of women turned away, because they weren’t White or Protestant.
As the Great Depression wore on, wanting only a way to make money, these women were excluded from “New Deal” work programs set up to help the unemployed. Men were seen as “breadwinners,” holding greater claim to economic resources. While outreach and charitable agencies ultimately did emerge, they were often inadequate to meet the demand.
Whereas black women had singular hard times participating in the mainstream cheaper while the Great Depression, they did have some chance to find alternative employment within their own communities, because of unique migration patterns that had occurred while that period. White women, in contrast, had a keyhole opportunity, if they were young and of considerable skills, although their skin color alone offered them greater access to anything primary employment was still available.
The rejection of primary female roles, and the desire for emancipation, however, put these women at profound risk once the cheaper collapsed. In any case, singular women, with both black and white skin, fared worse and were imperceptible sufferers.
As we enter the Second Great Depression, who will be the new “invisible homeless” and will women, as a group, fare good this time?
References:
Abelson, E. (2003, Spring2003). Women Who Have No Men to Work for Them: Gender and Homelessness in the Great Depression, 1930-1934. Feminist Studies, 29(1), 104. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from scholastic crusade Premier database.
Boyd, R. (2000, December). Race, Labor store Disadvantage, and Survivalist Entrepreneurship: Black Women in the Urban North while the Great Depression. Sociological Forum, 15(4), 647-670. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from scholastic crusade Premier database.
The imperceptible Women of the Great Depression
Thanks To : headphones for laptop
Tags: Depression, imperceptible, imperceptible Depression
Posted in Home Network Articles | No Comments »
